GUNOTSAV 2.0

Selection of council Inspectors The total number of inspectors was named through a three- stage ferocious process. Accreditation using 888 2 technology School delegation was done through an Android operation created by BISAG. 5. 

The report cards of the accredited seminaries were placed on the online platform in two phases ahead and after the reporting covid. Include all the bitsy print in the report card so that the seminaries can calculate on the result of Gunosva 2.0 for the varsity development plan. 

The frame was formed under the conscientious guidance of a core commission of about 50 members from different configurations of the Department of Education. E2 Kamavan Naar and Pilor School Inspectors were divided into zones and trained on the frame also piloted in about 850 seminaries to know the delicacy of the work as well as the understanding of the inspectors. it had been covered and reviewed periodically. the small print of each academe were vindicated by the QA team. 

Roll- avoidance of Merit 2.0. Following the successful performance of the birdman phase, Merit 2.0 was executed across the state. The frame and canon were approved by the Board of Governors of GSAAC under the leadership of Hon' ble Minister of Education. 

 Understand Regular discussion with ST through VCS. s! For wide content of flower inspans across the quarter, charge mode was administered with the help of quarter and block workers. Quat order Number of Inspectors. 

 

100 external evaluation of sodalities by a special shell of academe inspectors with educational background. Number of examination days and number of council inspectors predicated on the number of children in the academe. 

Evaluation process running throughout the time. Evaluation frame designed from the station of world systems and original experience during which the study and training processes are further weighted 5. Technology is swish habit to support the effectiveness of the evaluation process 6. Real- time monitoring for quality enhancement by QA team and reporting. 

 

 Merit 1.0 Merit 2.0 seminaries got grades only. seminaries are visiting be informed of areas for improvement in addition to grades. counting on the outgrowth of the academe, the seminaries would have to plan for the end of the improvement assessment. The meeting will give direction for planning for improvement and may also ensure the help of the system. There was a three- day charge mode program during which a total of 100 of the seminaries would be externally estimated. fairly one- third evaluation of seminaries with external conditions would be possible for lower than one- third of the special seminaries. Visits could indeed be possible. The commentator was a three- stage choice as anon- annotator, not inevitably a trainee. The evaluation process are visiting be conducted through named and intensively trained, SN inspectors who will grease the evaluation through ferocious use of technology.